Skater at Scotts Valley skatepark

What Will a Skatepark Really Cost?

Actual town expenses; other city's skatepark costs

What does Los Gatos actually pay to maintain its parks?

Los Gatos has 14 parks: Bachman, Belgatos, Blossom Hill, Fairview Plaza, Howes Play Lot, La Rinconada, Live Oak Manor, Los Gatos Creek Trail, Novitiate, Oak Meadow, Pageant Grounds, Worcester Park, and Town Plaza.

Parks and Public Works maintains 348.2 acres of parks, open space, and median islands, plus 12.9 miles of trails (another 18.76 acres, we estimate). The budget line item is $1.9 million, or $5,215 per acre per year.

"We don’t break down the costs by park," explains Los Gatos Director of Parks and Public Works Kevin Rohani.

The Park Services budget, according to the town budget, includes "maintaining plants, trees, lawns, irrigation systems in town parks, town facilities, street median islands, public right-of-ways, parking lots, trails and open space areas. Additional services include managing park use fees and reservations, providing code enforcement in the town’s parks and open space areas and ensuring the safety of parks playground equipment.” The proposed budget for Park Services this year is $1,913,720.

Twentysomething skater at Scotts Valley

Skaters are not all teenagers (Scotts Valley, Feb. 2)

The half-acre skatepark property at 41 Miles Ave. would cost the town, roughly, $2,634 per year to maintain along with its existing lands.

An $8 per hour supervisor would cost considerably more. If the skatepark is open 4 hours each weekday and 12 hours each weekend day, we would need 2,288 hours of staffing--approximately $25,000 per year.

Who paid for the parks and recreational facilities we have today in Los Gatos?

"The Town issued general obligation bonds in 1965 for the acquisition and construction of park and recreational facilities," according to Assistant Town Manager Pamela Jacobs. "These bonds were approved by at least 2/3 of Los Gatos voters. Repayment of the bonds was through ad valorem taxes on residential and commercial property within the Town."

Skater at Scotts Valley

Skater at Scotts Valley's Sky Park

A skatepark would primarily serve skateboard users, just as the town's tennis courts are mostly used by tennis players.

The tennis courts at Blossom Hill Park were constructed in 1975-76 as part of the park project, and the approximate cost of upkeep of the tennis courts is one hour a week, or $3,262 per year. LGS Recreation uses the courts about 20 days a year and pays the town $15 a day plus a $75 park use fee. (This is the same rate LGS Recreation pays to use the lawn at Blossom Hill park for soccer practice.)

It is unclear who built Baggerly Field at Blossom Hill Park and Balzer Field on Miles Ave. The Little League pays the town $1,000 a year, plus $300 a month for utilities for both, and they maintain the fields. According to Little League Fields Director Bob Hayden, the Little League spent $50,000 this year to replace the infields and refurbish the outfields. The town invested about $125,000, mostly park bond funds, in the snack shack facility adjacent to Balzer Field. The enlarged building includes brand new, handicap-accessible men and women's restrooms.

Fairview Plaza, a very small neighborhood park in a center island encircled by about a dozen houses, was deeded to the Town about 1915. According to Assistant Town Manager Jacobs, the residents maintained the park prior to the town's improvements (funded by state bond grants) to the park in fiscal year 2003-04. Since that time, the town has maintained the park, aggregating it with the others. Parks Commission chair Richard Konrad lives in Fairview Plaza.

The town periodically invests in its park infrastructure with an ongoing series of capital improvement projects. The completely renovated Town Plaza at Santa Cruz Ave. and Main St. is one example. There, the fountain was replaced with an interactive, computer-controlled fountain, mostly for the benefit of small children.

The Town Plaza project was originally expected to cost $700,000, with the old fountain to remain. In Sept. 2001, during the design phase, it was determined that the fountain needed to be replaced for operational reasons--adding $300 to $350 thousand to the cost. The town council suggested, at the time, that the difference could be made up by private fundraising. In Dec. 2001, councilmembers approved increasing the project's budget to $1,509,267, which included amending the town's budget and allocating appropriate redevelopment agency funds. The private fundraising idea was not pursued.

In 2002, the council authorized spending an estimated $3 million for construction (and just less than $100,000 in design fees) to replace the sidewalks downtown with brick-outlined concrete and brick planters at the crosswalks.

Los Gatos High School's new $2.8 million swimming pool was funded by a $1 million grant from the Valley Foundation, a $300,000 donation from the Town of Los Gatos, and $1.3 million from the Los Gatos Community Pool Foundation, which hired a professional fundraising company. One LGHS student gave $1,000 in scholarship funds to the pool, and the Class of 2002 donated $5,000.

What have other communities done?

There are at least 9 skateparks in Santa Clara County, ranging from flat parks with metal ramps at Mountain View and in Campbell, to the highly rated Sunnyvale Fair Oaks park. Palo Alto installed their park in 1990 as a result of outlawing stakeboards on the street. Santa Clara's $400,000 park, built in 2000, is for city residents only. None of the 9 were built with private donations.

Owen Yaryan, 6, skating at Scotts Valley's Sky Park

Owen Yaryan, 6, skating at Scotts Valley's Sky Park

Sunnyvale's park is 18,500 sq. ft. built for $570,092 (just over $30/sq. ft.) in 2002-03. Other skateparks include Gilroy, Palo Alto, a second in Sunnyvale and two in San Jose: Stonegate and Plato Arroyo. Gilroy's skatepark project began in 1997, before the state shielded communities from liability, and was funded by development impact fees only.

The person answering the phone in the City of Santa Cruz office denied that there was any intention to request private donations for that city's two skateparks. The top-rated Wave park cost $1.3 million, including a $200,000 bond.

Scotts Valley, with a third of the Los Gatos/Monte Sereno population, has a public recreation area to make anyone envious. On a cul-de-sac next to the transit center, down the street from the for-profit ice rink, is a community center, a senior center in a separate building, a soccer park, and the 22,000 sq. ft. Sky Park skatepark, rated just below Santa Cruz' Wave park. It cost about $750,000. It is fenced, but not supervised. "The liability would cost as much as staffing," we were told.

The Los Gatos Skatepark that Measure D would approve is about half the size of the Scotts Valley facility.

What do you think?

Enter your comments in the box below, then click Respond. You'll be asked to log in before your response is published.

Go to top
steve 02/04/08 9:33 am
How come the leaders of Los Gatos...Wasserman, McNutt, Pirezynski...And their friends who write all the negative letters..Ignore all the facts..

Thank you Los Gatos Observer :)

TheTruth 02/04/08 11:22 am
Thank you for answering my questions and reporting the true facts.

I would be interested to see if Mike Wasserman responds to this article, now that the facts are in front of him.

Thanks again.

robertgelkin 02/04/08 1:11 pm
Here are some additional skatepark photos for your consideration:

http://www.flickr.com/photos/23464670@N02/

TheTruth 02/04/08 1:19 pm
LOL! You crack me up. If we had a tagging problem in Los Gatos, then these might be relevant, but we don't.

Before you talk about how the skatepark will bring in the taggers, have a look at our parks. They would be tagged already if it were a problem.

Take your fake arguments elsewhere.

maria ristow 02/04/08 5:40 pm
In 2004, the Town Council unanimously approved and adopted the Application for Grant Funds for the Skate Park Project.

The application (a public document that should be read by all looking for facts in Measure D) contained language such as:

"Los Gatos Community members, in conjunction with the Town Council and Parks Commission, have identified a substantial need for a skate park in Town. After several years of community meetings and discussions, a location has been chosen - in close proximity to the downtown area, other recreational facilities, the creek trail system and neighborhoods - and a preliminary design has been completed. The site is a Town-owned parking lot....which the town is donating for this use."

"The Town of Los Gatos has numerous older park facilities.... providing recreational activities...neighborhood parks are maintained by the Town, with available active recreational facilities including baseball fields,lawn areas for informal soccer and frisbee-type activities, Bocce-ball, basketball, tennis courts, and creekside and hillside hiking and biking trails. Additionally, the local schools have basketball, football and soccer fields, the County maintains a large park with a small lake for boating activities..."

"Only one recreational activity has been identified as a completely unmet need for the Town's youth: Skateboarding. A Needs Assessment conducted by the Town of Los Gatos in 2003 indicated an unmet need for a skateboarding facility, while all other recreational services are adequate."

"The community and skateboarding youth first approached the Town requesting a skatepark in 2001. The proposed location has the support of community stakeholders and the nearby neighborhood, and is excellent from access and design perspectives."

Members of the 2004 Town Council were: Mike Wasserman, Sandy Decker, Dianne McNutt, Joe Pirzynski, and Steve Glickman. Glickman is the only one presently in favor of Measure D, while Wasserman and former Councilwoman Decker are spearheading efforts to defeat it.

All Measure D is asking that is different from the 2004 proposal that our Town Council approved, is that the Town pay the balance of the construction costs. (The grant was denied because the Town had too much money.) The site and maintenance of the park were approved by these present opponents. What changed??????
(Edited 02/04/08 4:42 pm)

jimsplace44 02/05/08 11:46 am
One BIG fact is that those who initiated this project promised to raise the funds to complete it. To date I do not believe they have raised over 20K, so now they are asking the town (the residents, the tax payers) to pony-up the money! What has changed since the onset is that the town offered to pay for the construction of a skatepark at a cost of around 250K. That wasn't good enough so the skaters turned it down, in favor of a design that will cost nearly a million dollars! What has changed?!?
Why should 98% of the town populace be snookered into paying for such an esoteric and small group? How many little league fields, soccer fields or community pools has the town been forced into building? Again I would ask, what about building a lake for crew members or rapids in the LG Creek for white water enthusiasts or a field for the Scottish Highland gamers?
Wonder why the council has stopped backing this project? Go to a meeting and find out!
It's bogus politicking on the part of a few, trying bilk money from the many.
Give it a rest or pony-up for it yourselves!
Peggy Dallas 02/05/08 12:47 pm
The Town of Los Gatos paid for, and maintains, the tennis courts at Blossom Hill Park for tennis players and play equipment at several parks around town for small children. The skatepark is play equipment for older children. Skaters are as organised a group as the children that use the play equipment.

Why doesn't the Town of Los Gatos have enough playing fields?! This has been a need of the residents of this Town ever since I moved here 18 years ago. Perhaps the way things have always been done here needs to change.

Peggy Dallas

TheTruth 02/05/08 1:28 pm
Peggy has nailed it! Maybe things here need to change.

It could be that the town goes by the saying, "If it's not broke, don't fix it." In reality they should probably be saying, "If it's not broke, then maybe we haven't looked hard enough to see what the problem is."

maria ristow 02/05/08 1:41 pm
How can the few bilk money from the many in a democratic election? We'll find out tonight what the many want to do with their money. Then we move on from there, as one town ready to work together on keeping and perhaps improving this the wonderful place we share.
TheTruth 02/05/08 2:58 pm
Of course you have to realize that many of our citizens, those who would use the park, cannot vote. As adults, we need to look out for their needs, but I'm afraid many are far too selfish.
brookswalls 02/06/08 9:37 am
we won !!!!
Johnny83 11/18/08 7:16 pm
Along with the skatepark there should be a stage built for live bands so that spectators can enjoy all the entertainment.