Los Gatos Camera

Saratogan Denied Service--Sues, Wins

Los Gatos Camera must pay $50k+

UPDATE: ADL Statement, miscellaneous corrections

Mitchell Cutler, the owner of La Fondue Restaurant in Saratoga, has won a judgement against Los Gatos Camera. Superior Court Judge Marc Poche ruled Feb. 8 that Los Gatos Camera discriminated against Mr. Cutler on August 11, 2005 when his business was refused. The judge permanently enjoined Los Gatos Camera from "denying any person full and equal accomodations, advantages, facilities, privileges or services on account of that person's religion or ancestry."

The judge ruled that Los Gatos Camera must pay Mr. Cutler the $4,000 prescribed by the Unruh Civil Rights statute (Ca. Civil Code 51), as well as attorney's fees and costs. The total judgement is $51,024.99.

"Mitchell Cutler's allegations show how bias--when left unchecked--can transform into bigotry," said Jonathan Bernstein of the Anti-Defamation League. "We applaud Mr. Cutler for taking a stand and successfully fighting this form of hatred right in his own [local area]."

David Muston, the owner of Los Gatos Camera for the past four years, feels he is the victim of a lawyer's trick. He believed that the case was without merit, because it was Muston himself who decided that Cutler should take his business elsewhere, and he knows he didn't do so based on Cutler's religion or ancestry.

"I told him I would take a bullet to defend him as a Jew," Mr. Muston explains, "but I will not honor terrorists." A poster in his office quotes former president Jimmy Carter: "We have become not a melting pot but a beautiful mosaic. Different people, different beliefs, different yearnings, different hopes, different dreams." Mr. Cutler denies having spoken directly with Mr. Muston.

Muston, a clear-eyed student of history beyond the comforting inaccuracies that societies tend to tell themselves, has formed independent opinions about why the world is what it is. His understanding of the violent history of pre-Israeli Palestine made him decide not to take Mr. Cutler's money.

Cutler's family photographs depicted groups of people, children, and other ordinary scenes. He wanted copies made for framing so as to honor his ancestors. He happened to mention to Mr. Muston's sales manager that some in the photographs fought in Israel and had to flee to France to avoid prosecution. Based on his knowledge of the Irgun Tsvai Leumi, a Zionist terrorist organization responsible for at least 250 murders before World War II, Mr. Muston concluded that Mr. Cutler was asking him to participate in the celebration of killers. Mr. Cutler felt that Mr. Muston's interpretation of his innocuous family photos masked an underlying anti-Semitism.

Mitch Cutler was inclined to let it go, but his wife, Tracey, who had had photographs of her Swedish ancestors processed at Los Gatos Camera without incident, was adamant. She convinced Mitch that Mr. Muston's attitude was wrong and on Sept. 21, 2005, he had his attorney, Los Gatan Alan Nudelman, file suit, which wound its way through the system during 2006.

Confident that he was within his rights to refuse service to Mr. Cutler, David Muston dismissed his attorney several months before the matter came to trial. Cutler said he was refused because he was Jewish, Muston said it was because the people in the photographs were terrorists, and Muston had a witness to his conversation with Cutler.

The legal maneuver that may have cost Mr. Muston the judgement occurred at 4 p.m. on the Friday before the Monday morning trial. Attorney Nudelman focused his complaint against Los Gatos Camera, removing Muston as a defendant. Before the judge on Monday, Jan. 22, Mr. Muston discovered that while he could represent himself, only an attorney could represent the company. With no one to argue his side of the case, Mr. Muston left the courtroom. He says he was escorted out.

"No appearance was made for defendant Los Gatos Camera, Inc.," wrote Judge Poche. "The plaintiff presented his proofs and good cause...to the satisfaction of the Court."

In an e-mail to Mr. Cutler and various others, including several news organizations, Mr. Muston predicted that this "temporary victory" would be easily overturned on appeal.

"The bottom line?" Mr. Muston told the Observer. "The next customer who wants to make a picture of anyone who committed violent acts of terrorism--I will tell them no. I do not honor terrorists."

"I believe I am very lucky to be able to afford to defend myself and seek justice from the courts," Mr. Cutler told the Observer. "I do not allow myself to be bullied by anyone." He intends to donate the entire fine to charity.

What do you think?

Enter your comments in the box below, then click Respond. You'll be asked to log in before your response is published.

Go to top
Adam Holland 02/21/07 11:33 am
The assumption that Israelis of the pioneer generation were "terrorists" is intrinsically bigoted. Just because there were Jewish terrorists in that era does not justify the camera shop owner's assumption that all Jews were terrorists. In fact, very few were. This Muston fellow is apparently very confused.
adam tessman 03/20/07 11:36 am
The Unruh Civil Rights statute seems too invasive to me. I believe that any business owner or employee should have the legal right to refuse service to any customer for any reason or even for no reason at all!
Government and organizations that receive government grants should probably be governed by such anti-discrimination law but private businesses should have the right, under the constituion, to serve only the customers they want to serve.
Don Wolf 04/26/07 11:34 am
England gave up its administration of Palestine because of the Jewish terrorists and turned Palestine over to the League of Nations which then decided to create the state of Israel. Of course, not all Jews were terrorists just like not all Palestinians are terrorists. However, it was all the Jews in Palestine who benefited from the terrorism the same as the Palestinian support of Hamas is hoped to benefit all Palestinians. And like the Palestinian election of Hamas as their legitimate government, Israel elected an infamous terrorist leader, Begin, as their leader. History repeats in strange ways. Also, as the article points out, the best route to justice is a big bank account.
Kathleen Kinzler 02/08/09 3:25 pm
The important thing here is that the defendant actually did not get to defend himself, and the judge did nothing to make sure that justice was actually served, by allowing him time to get his business a lawyer, when he could not represent it.
Silver Fox 02/09/09 11:32 am
The important thing here is that this is two years old and no-one cares. Apart from you.
LosGatosResident 02/10/09 7:38 pm
Are we, like, running out of news in Los Gatos?
Silver Fox 02/12/09 11:46 am
Yes, we have run out of news. Or is this news in itself? Can you in fact run out of news? Whatever the answer it will be allied to the credit crunch as that is the root of all evil.

In fact I do have some news: the Department of Defense have announced new pay scales for the army, heavily favoring the NCO’s. A new recruit said "It’s all very well for the sergeants and the corporals, but it’s a nasty blow to the privates."

Silver Fox 02/12/09 12:18 pm
Wow. I can't believe this hasn't been picked up yet. A friend just called me to say that a ship carrying red paint has collided with a ship carrying purple paint near the GG Bridge. It is believed that both crews have been marooned.

Anyone know if this is true?