Santa Cruz Mountains east of Hwy. 17

Logging Alternative: Public Ownership

Mid-Pen Open Space Mulls Involvement in S.J. Water Controversy

San Jose Water Company's plans to harvest timber on part of some 6,500 acres it owns around Los Gatos Creek may end with the sale of the land to a public-private consortium that would protect the watershed from development or excessive logging. The Water Company is not involved in the discussion as yet, but the idea sounds attractive to those opposed to granting open-ended logging approval to the utility.

The logging plan is currently under review by the California Dept. of Forestry (CAL FIRE), but if the Water Company's plan is approved, the issue may be tied up in court for years. The current plan is the company's second for this property; if it is denied, they can draft a new plan. Neighbors Against Irresponsible Logging (NAIL) have been fighting San Jose Water for almost two years. It remains to be seen how long the controversy will continue, leading some to speculate on a third alternative.

"We've talked about possibilities," says Los Gatan Pete Siemens, Director of the Mid-Peninsula Regional Open Space District. "Public ownership [of the watershed] makes more sense in the long run." The purchase would require a willing seller, of course. And if San Jose Water is willing to sell, how much do they think the property is worth?

"We have properties we're looking at," explains Siemens, "where the owner is asking three or four times what it's worth. So, we wait and see what happens." Mid-Pen can be very patient. The special district, created by the voters in 1972, has permanently preserved 50,000 acres so far, mostly in the Santa Cruz Mountains. Siemens, a former mayor of Los Gatos, is the elected director of Ward 1, which includes our corner of Santa Clara County as far north as Highway 85 in Cupertino.

"We'll have to wait and see, but we are interested in protecting the area's beautiful natural environment for future generations," Siemens concludes. "To accomplish this, the District will have to work in partnership with other organizations."

A consortium consisting of a private preservation group, a State grant, and Mid-Pen is one possibility. It was this sort of pooling of interests that enabled Mid-Pen to add the Bear Creek Redwoods Open Space Preserve, not far from the Water Company project, to its Sierra Azul holdings in 1999. In this case, the partner was the Peninsula Open Space Trust (POST).

"Voters approved Prop. 84 last year," Siemens mentions, in passing. Proposition 84 authorizes $5.4 billion in bonds for water quality, natural resource protection and park improvements.

"We have had discussions with Mid-Peninsula," says San Jose Water Company spokesman John Tang, "and we will continue to have discussions. We want to ensure water rights and water quality--that's our main focus, and it's why we are proposing the NTMP."

What do you think?

Enter your comments in the box below, then click Respond. You'll be asked to log in before your response is published.

Go to top
Kevin Flynn 02/10/07 4:46 pm
It is critical that the logging plan be stopped. The asking price for the watershed land is likely to increase should SJWC obtain the NTMP logging permit. At the January 31 public hearing, presentation of evidence was made to CDF that San Jose Water Company owns over 2,700 acres of timberland. This places them over the 2,500 acre limit imposed by CDF for a NTMP permit. This evidence includes over 700 high definition aerial photographs of all SJWC land holdings mapped to GoogleEarth. SJWC claims that they hold only 2,002 acres of timberland - but as of February 10 they have not submitted their supporting data to CDF.
Jodi Frediani 02/11/07 10:19 am
Your reporter says "The current plan is the company's second for this property." While that is technically true, in reality this one is simply an amended version of the original flawed plan submitted in 2005. CDF rightfully asked SJWC to withdraw that version to correct lacking and/or faulty information. CDF needs to do the same once again. This time, however, the acreage flaw identified at the public hearing is fatal. The evidence shows SJWC does not qualify for an in-perpetuity logging permit. Unless SJWC can prove otherwise, they will have to start from scratch to apply for a 3-year permit. A conservation alternative seems a simpler, better solution.
Rebecca Moore 03/23/07 8:55 pm
As of March 23, 2007, SJWC has still not submitted any evidence to support their claim of only 2,002 timberland acres. CDF formally requested this evidence a month ago, and is still waiting. Almost two months have passed since the public hearing. Meanwhile, the review of this logging plan continues. It is troubling that we as taxpayers are funding a very expensive review process for a logging plan that does not even qualify for consideration.
(Edited 03/23/07 7:57 pm)